Paul wrote Philippians, but, according to the Epistle of John, Paul is a false prophet. They both have their own sections in the Bible that rail against and oppose each other. This feud made its way into the Book of the Word of God, and to me, this should put both of their epistles into question. Why did they feel the need to be at odds over the truth and suggest that one is more worthy or more holy than the other? This is why I do not read nor care about either man's epistles. I only care about the truth, and neither man's book rings true with me. I am a reader and follower of the Old Testament. I am always sceptical over the New Testament. I prefer the older, the one without all the bickering over who is more right or more holy than the other. I especially say this because Paul lays claim that we should confess with our tongues that Yahuah is Yahusha Ha'Mashiach. I will not. Yahuah is Yahuah, and Yahusha is Yahusha. The only way we are to refer to them being one in the same, is through the Holy Spirit, which, to me, is our one universal consciousness, so to speak. But, even with that said, that is still Paul's section of the bible, which is the New Testament, which to me is full of bullshit. As I have said, the Old Testament is all that I consider to be the most accurate. The old Testament contains the books of Genesis and Jubilees. My preference is to stick to these two books mostly, and ignore the ridiculousness that is the New Testament. Not to say that there isn't goodness in the New Testament, there is plenty of goodness in the New Testament. This is just a personal preference I have about what content that I willingly choose to digest.